"This is the bible on vaccine info. Ignore at your own risk."
~ Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, MD
We look forward to working with you going into the future.
~ Dr. P. M. (Museum of Truth, Durban, South Africa)
This is a great site, thank you.
~ Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy
no jab for me
The site contains 430+ links to various primary sources. It takes a few seconds to load.
Statements in this site are substantiated with facts that will stand in a court of law. Informed Consent requires a flow of accurate, unfiltered information.
Click on the hyperlinked sections to direct you to primary sources such as CDC, WHO, FDA documents.
Anyone trying to take down this site, either by disabling links or posting warnings that this site is dangerous, will be named as codefendant in the equivalent of another Nuremberg trial for being an accomplice to crimes against humanity. That includes social media and newsletter executives and their order takers. Lawyers are standing by.
This is the effort of a one-man team: a passionate, relentless, well-traveled nomad living in his vehicle, who loves humanity and the Truth, by the name of Paul Adams. He already had a NDE and beat COVID at age 67 in 2020.
My other sites:
NoJab.ICU - New
10MaskFails.Top - New
Consider Contributing to my Efforts.
Checks can be sent to:
10866 Washington Blvd. #856
Culver City, CA
Before you email me for Legal Advice please click "Legal Forms" below. If the answer is not in there, unfortunately I can't help you.
© Paul Adams. All rights reserved. This site layout and graphics cannot be duplicated. Contents are in the public domain.
... The secret animal studies
The animal studies were not long term studies. At most, they lasted 8 weeks, and come with some very problematic conclusions:
a. "No viral replication was detectable in the nose of any of the eight animals in the 100-μg dose group by day 2 after challenge"
Yet, the vaccinated are not promised immunity from COVID-19 infection.
b. "Vaccination of nonhuman primates with mRNA-1273 induced robust SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity, rapid protection in the upper and lower airways, and no pathologic changes in the lung."
Real world data with humans arrive at completely different conclusions.
c. "After SARS-CoV-2 infection, nonhuman primates have transient viral replication in the upper and lower airways and mild inflammation in the lung that resolves within 14 days. Thus, nonhuman primates are a useful animal model for assessing vaccine-mediated protection against early viral replication."
This corroborates with Fauci's assertions of the therapeutic nature of these shots in decreasing the severity of the illness - not inhibiting infection or contamination.
d. "In addition to the lung sections from these earlier time points, lung sections from animals that were killed at day 14 or 15 after challenge had no evidence of substantial inflammation, and neither viral RNA nor viral antigen was detected in any of the groups, including the control group. Vaccine-associated immunopathologic changes were not observed in any of the sections examined."
How many animals were killed? When in 2020 did the study take place?
It stands to reason that no animal study can be highlighted or broadcast with confidence when it is riddled with holes.